Alberto via GitHub
Alexandra Lacourba
Alexandru Daicy via GitHub
Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Consensus write-up on "Optimization" Use Case (#44)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Consensus write-up on "Optimization" Use Case (#44)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add more details and events to agenda.
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add more details and events to agenda.
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Deweaponize 'all known' (#60)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Privacy Budgets in IPA (#127)
- [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Add Agenda to London F2F
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add Agenda to London F2F
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - threat model for first party data (#124)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18)
- [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: rename Design Teams to task forces
- [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: team contact name + copyright
- Re: [patwg-charter] Deweaponize 'all known' (#60)
- [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: remove anti-trust section
- [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Indicate no draft for private attribution measurement
- [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Putting a preliminary timeline in place responding to review
- [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Putting a preliminary timeline in place responding to review
Benjamin M. Case via GitHub
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Privacy Budgets in IPA (#127)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Privacy Budgets in IPA (#127)
- [meetings] Agenda Request - Privacy Budgets in IPA (#127)
benjaminsavage via GitHub
- [docs-and-reports] Closed Pull Request: Data Join can occur off device
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Data Join can occur off device (#45)
- [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Consensus on server-side data join
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Data Join can occur off device (#45)
- [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Data Join can occur off device
- [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Consensus write-up on "Optimization" Use Case
- Re: [patwg-charter] Charter should include baseline privacy boundaries (#61)
Brian May via GitHub
Charlie Harrison via GitHub
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Add cross-environment section to the areas of general agreement (#47)
- [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Add cross-environment section to the areas of general agreement
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Data Join can occur off device (#45)
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add cross device slides
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add label DP slides
- Re: [patwg-charter] Charter should include baseline privacy boundaries (#61)
- [meetings] Agenda Request - Short presentation on label DP results (#128)
Chris Needham via GitHub
- Re: [patwg-charter] Deweaponize 'all known' (#60)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Deweaponize 'all known' (#60)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Deweaponize 'all known' (#60)
Don Marti via GitHub
grahammudd via GitHub
- Closed: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
James Rosewell via GitHub
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - On premise trusted servers (#122)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Following discussion with a number of colleagues this PR covers issue… (#18)
marianapr via GitHub
- Re: [meetings] Add files via upload (#136)
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add files via upload
- [meetings] Agenda Request - threat model for first party data (#124)
Martin Thomson via GitHub
Maxime Vono via GitHub
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add TEE vs MPC Criteo slides
- [meetings] Agenda Request - TEE vs MPC for trusted servers (#123)
Michael Kleber via GitHub
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Draft consensus on "Can [TEE / MPC] be used as a private computation configuration?" (#46)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Draft consensus on "Can [TEE / MPC] be used as a private computation configuration?" (#46)
- [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Draft consensus on "Can [TEE / MPC] be used as a private computation configuration?"
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Methods for measuring privacy risk (#129)
Phillipp Schoppmann via GitHub
- [meetings] Pull Request: Add malicious partitioning slides
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Malicious Partitioning Without Sorting (#125)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Malicious Partitioning Without Sorting (#125)
- [meetings] Agenda Request - Malicious Partitioning Without Sorting (#125)
Samuel Weiler via GitHub
- [patwg-charter] Pull Request: team contact name + copyright
- [patwg-charter] Pull Request: rename Design Teams to task forces
- [patwg-charter] Pull Request: remove anti-trust section
- [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Indicate no draft for private attribution measurement
Sean Turner via GitHub
- Re: [patwg-charter] Charter should include baseline privacy boundaries (#61)
- Re: [admin] Meeting: 14-15 June 2023 -- F2F in London (#14)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Presenting EXPAT (#121)
- Re: [admin] Meeting: 14-15 June 2023 -- F2F in London (#14)
- Re: [admin] Meeting: 14-15 June 2023 -- F2F in London (#14)
- Re: [admin] Meeting: 14-15 June 2023 -- F2F in London (#14)
- Re: [admin] Meeting: 14-15 June 2023 -- F2F in London (#14)