- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:31:27 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/JH1
> >
> > The tone of JH1 seems unnecessarily hostile. Please at least drop the
> > paragraph beginning, "Comments during the CR phase..."
>
> Isn't there some W3C document that states that comments during CR are
> supposed to be about implementation, not design? I seem to remember
> reading this, but now I can't find the document.
There may be something in that direction, but it certainly does not
entitle us to ignore comments on the design:
Starting with a Last Call review up to the transition to Proposed
Recommendation, a Working Group MUST formally address any
substantive review comment about a technical report and SHOULD do
so in a timely manner.
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html
(As a logician, do you find that use of "any" to be a little odd?
Should it be rephrased in the plural, with "all"? Anyway, the intent is
clear.)
-- Sandro
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:31:47 UTC