- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:24:02 -0400
- To: <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I certainly see no problem with adding some minor explanatory text along these lines. peter From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Explain profile acronyms Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:40:57 -0500 > IMHO this is a not completely unreasonable request. I would propose > to respond by adding to the Introduction of Profiles: > > * brief explanations of the acronyms, namely: > - The EL acronym reflects the profile's basis in the EL family of > description logics [EL++]. > - The QL acronym reflects the fact that query answering in this > profile can implemented by rewriting queries into a standard > relational Query Language. > - The RL acronym reflects the fact that reasoning in this profile > can be implemented using a standard Rule Language. > * the statement "Note that each of the profiles is a (strict) > syntactic subset of OWL DL, but none of the profiles is a subset of > another." > > Comments and/or other suggestions? > > Ian > > >> From: Gioele Barabucci <barabucc@cs.unibo.it> >> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:54:08 +0200 >> To: public-owl-comments@w3.org >> Message-ID: <20090720125407.GA32507@cs.unibo.it> >> >> Hello, >> >> could you please document the meaning of the EL, QL and DL acronyms in >> the overview section of owl2-profiles and other OWL 2 documents? >> >> Also, could you explicitly state whether an OWL 2 profile is a strict >> subset of another? >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Gioele Barabucci <barabucc@cs.unibo.it> > > >
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 17:24:25 UTC