- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:21:49 +0100
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 13 Apr 2009, at 21:11, Michael Schneider wrote: [snip] > * The cited reference "[OWL2]" points to the Primer. I believe the > Document Overview is the best document to generically refer to OWL 2. [snip] Really? That seems unfortunate. Or is that a design goal for Overview? (I would have thought Syntax, but I guess the problem is that it doesn't encompass semantics? Anyway.) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 20:22:46 UTC