- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:34:08 +0000
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ RequirementsDraft#Annotated_Bibilography.2FUse_Cases Couple of comments: This involved an attempt to sort through the document and use bits of it (i.e., find a use case, understand it, extract it). It wasn't fun so this reinforced my point (and, I believe, our general agreement) that the document needs tightening and focusing. I've concerns about the Overview text. I'm unclear where this came from and how it relates to the several papers sometimes associated with it. I'd rather we just used abstracts from the papers and have one row per paper. In other words, I'd rather have something closer to: <http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pTmcCXR-dV6TdDo24Tse-fQ> By "Exhibit" I mean: <http://simile.mit.edu/exhibit/> I'd rather have an exhibit than a table. I'd rather have it extensible than frozen. Anyhoo, this discharges my action item, thus I've closed it in the tracker. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 10:31:42 UTC