W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: RDF features in OWL 2

From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:22:57 -0800
Message-ID: <490F4F91.5070209@sandsoft.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Michael --

That was our preliminary conclusion, but we wanted to confirm one last 
time, "just to make sure" :).

Best,

Elisa


Michael Schneider wrote:

>Hi!
>
>I think Jie's question can easily be answered. Have a look in Section 2.3 of
>the Specification:
>
>  <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#URIs_and_Namespaces>
>
>All the URIs asked for have an "rdf" namespace prefix, so they are reserved
>according to Table 2. And none of these URIs appear in Table 3 ("Reserved
>Vocabulary with Special Treatment"). So the answer is "not supported in OWL
>2 DL" to all these URIs.
>
>The related (now closed) issue is ISSUE-104 ("dissallowed vocabulary").
>
>Further, there is no (explicit semantic) relationship between the original
>RDF Reification ("rdf:Statement") and the new annotation-reification
>("owl:Axiom") vocabulary. We have introduced the latter as a resolution for
>ISSUE-67 ("reification for axiom annotation"). 
>
>Michael
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>>On Behalf Of Ian Horrocks
>>Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 2:24 PM
>>To: Jie Bao
>>Cc: W3C OWL Working Group
>>Subject: Re: RDF features in OWL 2
>>
>>
>>Sorry for the slow reply -- still catching up after the F2F and ISWC.
>>
>>Speaking for myself, I don't see any point in including these
>>features in the QR.
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>
>>On 23 Oct 2008, at 01:12, Jie Bao wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi All
>>>
>>>I'm not quite sure whether the following RDF features are still
>>>supported in OWL 2
>>>
>>>* complex values using rdf:value, e.g.
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/#example21
>>>* RDF containers
>>>* RDF reification (in particular, I'm not sure about its relationship
>>>to owl:Axiom reification)
>>>
>>>I'm asking for decisions on whether to include them in the quick
>>>reference. I didn't see their presence in any of the existing OWL 2
>>>documents. Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>Jie
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>--
>Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
>FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe
>Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
>Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
>Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
>Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de
>Web  : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555
>
>FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
>Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
>Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
>Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
>Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe
>Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer
>Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 19:50:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC