- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:30:52 +0100
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Oct 23, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > > We discussed this in the first teleconf [1] and agreed that, rather > than migrating these (probably mostly irrelevant) issues, WG > members who want to champion an issue from the WebOnt list should > simply raise an appropriate new issue. Argh. Here I go nitpicking. Ian, you've written "raise" an issue several times today. In the telecon we talked about proposing issues (say, in the google code issue list) and the fact that chairs have discretion about which proposed issues are "raised". (This is Sandro's distinction. In my lexicon, raise = sandro:propose and open = sandro:raise.) This is important because only chairs can sandro:raise/open issues and they are not required to sandro:raise/open all issues that the WG participants raise/sandro:propose. Can we pick a terminology and stick with it? :) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:31:11 UTC