- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
It is probably better to *not* call this "Submission". (W3C might get mad at you.) How about calling it "OWL 1.1"? Actually, it probably would be even better to have two links, one called "Submission" and one called "OWL 1.1". I note that the charter defines the starting point as the submission, i.e., a fixed set of documents, but also refers to the OWL 1.1 issues list, which is not. Actually, even better .... peter From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Homework, updated submission Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:58:23 -0400 > > Just a note to point out that we are aiming to read the updated > version of the documents that were part of the W3C submission, which, > for lack of a better name, is still labeled "Submission" in the > navigation bar. Note that the document called "MOF-Based Metamodel" > wasn't part of the submission, but should be considered in you > reading... > > Specifically, the URI for these documents is: http://www.webont.org/ > owl/1.1/ > > -Alan > >
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 07:06:12 UTC