- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:46:15 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I have changed the link to be "OWL 1.1", noting that that the charter says: > Note that this charter uses the term “OWL 1.1” for easy reference. > However, it is up to the Working Group to decide whether the final > name of the extension will bear the name “OWL 1.1” or not, and > whether the new features will be in the same namespace as the > current OWL terms or not. -Alan On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > It is probably better to *not* call this "Submission". (W3C might get > mad at you.) How about calling it "OWL 1.1"? > > Actually, it probably would be even better to have two links, one > called > "Submission" and one called "OWL 1.1". I note that the charter > defines > the starting point as the submission, i.e., a fixed set of documents, > but also refers to the OWL 1.1 issues list, which is not. > > Actually, even better .... > > peter > > > From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> > Subject: Homework, updated submission > Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:58:23 -0400 > >> >> Just a note to point out that we are aiming to read the updated >> version of the documents that were part of the W3C submission, which, >> for lack of a better name, is still labeled "Submission" in the >> navigation bar. Note that the document called "MOF-Based Metamodel" >> wasn't part of the submission, but should be considered in you >> reading... >> >> Specifically, the URI for these documents is: http://www.webont.org/ >> owl/1.1/ >> >> -Alan >> >>
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 14:46:39 UTC