- From: Matthew Horridge <matthew.horridge@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:22:40 +0100
- To: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Here's what I think the problem is....
Suppose we have (in an OWL 1.0 ontology)
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
contributor">
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en-US">Contributor</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en-US">An entity responsible for making
contributions to the
content of the resource.</rdfs:comment>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Examples of a Contributor
include a person, an
organisation, or a service. Typically, the name of a
Contributor should be used to indicate the entity.</
dc:description>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/>
</owl:AnnotationProperty>
This is an annotation property, which has annotations on it. How do
we transform this to OWL 1.1? I couldn't see a way to do this last
time I looked at the spec. I believe that we need something like
'AnnotationPropertyAnnotation(' OWLAnnotationProperty(<URI>)
{Annotation} ')'
i.e. something like entity annotation axioms but for annotation URIs.
Cheers,
Matthew
On 12 Jul 2007, at 08:28, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Michel_Dumontier wrote:
>
>> Bijan,
>>
>> The most likely explanation is garble in the reporting. All I
>> want is my annotation properties back ;-)
>
> Sure. But now, in order to figure out what's going one, we need
> more detail. Care to post an example of your problematic constructs?
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 10:22:52 UTC