Re: annotation properties

On Jul 12, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Michel_Dumontier wrote:

> Bijan,
>
> The most likely explanation is garble in the reporting.  All I want  
> is my annotation properties back ;-)

Sure. But now, in order to figure out what's going one, we need more  
detail. Care to post an example of your problematic constructs?

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 07:28:21 UTC