- From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:29:08 +0100
- To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Hi The New Features and Rationale document [1] has the following RDF example: :UpperLobeOfLung owl:disjointWith ( :MiddleLobeOfLung :LowerLobeOfLung ) . However going by [2], [3] and [4] the correct syntax seems to be: [] rdf:type owl:AllDisjointClasses ; owl:members ( :UpperLobeOfLung :MiddleLobeOfLung :LowerLobeOfLung ) . Allowing a list of class descriptions for owl:disjointWith would break backwards compatibility anyway, or? Regards, Simon [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-new-features-20091027/#F2:_DisjointClasses [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20091027/#Semantic_Conditions_for_Equivalence_and_Disjointness [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-rdf-based-semantics-20091027/#Semantic_Conditions_for_N-ary_Disjointness [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-primer-20091027/#Class_Disjointness
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 16:29:43 UTC