Re: Proposal: face meeting in Madrid

I think that those topics are the weakest topics in ORTC, and we should 
leave them resolved asap to avoid "backward compatibility issues" that 
would prevent us to have a much more efficient/user friendly api.

I believe that a face 2 face meeting is much more effective for solving 
this, but I understand that we are quite far away to do it, so I am ok 
with the virtual meetings.

Best regards
Sergio

On 31/03/2016 4:01, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
> [BA] There are open issues relating to the object model for 
> RTX/RED/FEC that have the potential to affect both the ORTC API as 
> well as WebRTC 1.0:
>
> Issue 444 (RTX APT): https://github.com/openpeer/ortc/issues/444 
> <https://github.com/openpeer/ortc/issues/444>
>
> Issue 440 (Split RTCRtpEncodingParameters): 
> https://github.com/openpeer/ortc/issues/440 
> <https://github.com/openpeer/ortc/issues/440>
>
> Issue 528 (RTX/RED/FEC handling): 
> https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/548 
> <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/548>
>
> My preference would be to have a discussion of these issues well 
> before TPAC (or even the July IETF meeting in Berlin).
>
> This could be accomplished via an online meeting (an ORTC CG meeting 
> and/or a WebRTC WG virtual interim)
>
> Peter said:
>
> “Would it make sense to do so near TPAC, since that's nearby?  Or even
>
> around the July IETF, which is in Berlin?  I love Spain (I used to live
>
> there), and would enjoy going there, but for me (and I'm guessing others),
>
> doing on long trip with two spots nearby is easier than two long trips (or
>
> N vs N+1, as the case may be).
>
> ”
>