- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:13:35 +0100
- To: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
- Cc: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
2016-02-29 17:06 GMT+01:00 Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>: > The problem with adding something like this to the specification is > 1/ it is hard to maintain something that is both correct and complete > 2/ you are supporting the assumption that shimming the peerconnection on top > of ORTC and/or passing around SDP blobs as a signaling protocol is a good > idea to start with. > > Sounds more like you should write a blog post (for webrtchacks?) That's why I asked about the proper place to do it. The point is that I want to start it but, at some point, I'm pretty sure that I'll need help from the ORTC team to complete/fix it. That's why I asked for a "collaborative" place to do it. Any suggestion is welcome. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 16:14:26 UTC