- From: Victor Pascual Avila <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:22:24 +0100
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
how about a shared file on drive or github? we'd then be happy to publish at webrtchacks On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote: > 2016-02-29 17:06 GMT+01:00 Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>: >> The problem with adding something like this to the specification is >> 1/ it is hard to maintain something that is both correct and complete >> 2/ you are supporting the assumption that shimming the peerconnection on top >> of ORTC and/or passing around SDP blobs as a signaling protocol is a good >> idea to start with. >> >> Sounds more like you should write a blog post (for webrtchacks?) > > That's why I asked about the proper place to do it. The point is that > I want to start it but, at some point, I'm pretty sure that I'll need > help from the ORTC team to complete/fix it. That's why I asked for a > "collaborative" place to do it. > > Any suggestion is welcome. > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> > -- Victor Pascual Ávila
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 16:23:04 UTC