- From: Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
 - Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:52:30 +0000
 - To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
 - CC: Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
 - Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E5B3A58@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
 
+1.
9 or 10pm on a Friday night in Europe is not a time most people sit down to start a meeting unless it is in the pub ☺.
Andy
From: Mary Barnes [mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 October 2014 17:47
To: Alexandre GOUAILLARD
Cc: Erik Lagerway; public-ortc@w3.org
Subject: Re: ORTC CG Meeting #6 - Agenda Bashing
Yeah, that time is pretty much only convenient for people in North (and I guess South) American timezones.  Certainly, it's hard to find something that works for everyone, but afternoon Pacific time is bad for many.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com<mailto:agouaillard@gmail.com>> wrote:
hum,
4am singapore time saturday 18th ......
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com<mailto:erik@hookflash.com>> wrote:
My bad,
Pacific - Daylight Savings. (PDT)
UTC/GMT -7 hour
In case anyone was wondering, DST ends on Sunday 02 November 2014, 02:00 local daylight time = this will not affect the meeting time.
Erik Lagerway<http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/> | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter<http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog<http://webrtc.is/>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com<mailto:mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>> wrote:
What's the timezone?
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com<mailto:erik@hookflash.com>> wrote:
It's getting near that time again, the proposed date for the next ORTC CG Meeting:
Friday October 17 at 1pm.
The draft agenda:
---
Review of spec changes
Outstanding 1.0 issues
 - Stats
 - IdP
 - Synchronize with 1.0
  - Datachannel ?
Rename IceListener to IceGatherer
Latching rules definition & added into spec
 - Undefined RTP listening behavior - issue 48
Discuss SVC "automatic" configuration scenario vs manual configuration
Call for implementations. Existing reference implementations:
 - ORTC Library: http://www.slideshare.net/ErikLagerway/ortc-lib-introduction
  - Call for help, there is plenty to do, some examples:
    - Browsers - JS Shim work
    - Servers - Node.js work eg. SIP to ORTC Gateway
 - Google progress; Canary 39 Sender/Receiver - JS bindings, when will we see the rest of the ORTC API ?
 - Microsoft progress; Progress of Modern API? Under Consideration to Under Development ?
Discuss options to migrate this work into the W3C WebRTC WG
---
Comments? Are we missing anything?
/Erik
Erik Lagerway<http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway>  | Hookflash<http://hookflash.com/>  | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter<http://twitter.com/elagerway>  | WebRTC.is Blog<http://webrtc.is/>
--
Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTO - Temasys Communications, S'pore / Mountain View
President - CoSMo Software, Cambridge, MA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard<http://sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard>
·
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 16:52:54 UTC