Re: ORTC CG Meeting #6 - Agenda Bashing

Yeah, that time is pretty much only convenient for people in North (and I
guess South) American timezones.  Certainly, it's hard to find something
that works for everyone, but afternoon Pacific time is bad for many.


On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
wrote:

> hum,
>
> 4am singapore time saturday 18th ......
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote:
>
>> My bad,
>>
>> Pacific - Daylight Savings. (PDT)
>>
>> UTC/GMT -7 hour
>>
>> In case anyone was wondering, DST ends on Sunday 02 November 2014, 02:00
>> local daylight time = this will not affect the meeting time.
>>
>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash
>> <http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> What's the timezone?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's getting near that time again, the proposed date for the next ORTC
>>>> CG Meeting:
>>>>
>>>> Friday October 17 at 1pm.
>>>>
>>>> The draft agenda:
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Review of spec changes
>>>>
>>>> Outstanding 1.0 issues
>>>>  - Stats
>>>>  - IdP
>>>>  - Synchronize with 1.0
>>>>   - Datachannel ?
>>>>
>>>> Rename IceListener to IceGatherer
>>>>
>>>> Latching rules definition & added into spec
>>>>  - Undefined RTP listening behavior - issue 48
>>>> Discuss SVC "automatic" configuration scenario vs manual configuration
>>>>
>>>> Call for implementations. Existing reference implementations:
>>>>  - ORTC Library:
>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/ErikLagerway/ortc-lib-introduction
>>>>   - Call for help, there is plenty to do, some examples:
>>>>     - Browsers - JS Shim work
>>>>     - Servers - Node.js work eg. SIP to ORTC Gateway
>>>>  - Google progress; Canary 39 Sender/Receiver - JS bindings, when will
>>>> we see the rest of the ORTC API ?
>>>>  - Microsoft progress; Progress of Modern API? Under Consideration to
>>>> Under Development ?
>>>>
>>>> Discuss options to migrate this work into the W3C WebRTC WG
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Comments? Are we missing anything?
>>>>
>>>> /Erik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway>  | *Hookflash
>>>> <http://hookflash.com/> * | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>>>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway>  | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/>  *
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CTO - Temasys Communications, S'pore / Mountain View
> President - CoSMo Software, Cambridge, MA
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard
>
>    -
>
>