Re: Exchange of "settings" versus exchange of "capabilities"/"preferences"

On May 5, 2014, at 5:38 PM, "Robin Raymond" <robin@hookflash.com<mailto:robin@hookflash.com>> wrote:

 We've been throwing around some use case concepts for a while but it would be good to have a bit more of a firm list of the scenarios we want to be able to support out of the gate.


[BA] For me, the list of required simulcast/SVC use cases is pretty simple:

1. Temporal scalability. This one is basic because it is the most popular mode of H.264/SVC, and it is built in to VP8/9 and HEVC.

2. Spatial simulcast with temporal scalability. This combination of modes is supported in the Open H.264 encoder as well as quite a few commercial products.

That's it.  From my perspective all other combinations of temporal/spatial/quality and simulcast are optional.  That isn't to say they aren't cool, just that you can get a lot of mileage out of these two without too much complexity (or encoding horsepower).

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 02:53:07 UTC