Re: A proposal for solving non-muxed RTCP *and* ICE freezing

2014-05-03 3:21 GMT+02:00 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>:
> We don't have a way for the app to express that it wants to have RTCP that isn't multiplexed with RTP

Hi, sure I've missed some previous threads about this subject but...
why do we need non-mutex RTCP?

If I'm not wrong, non-mutex RTCP means two separate DTLS connections
with different sessions keys for SRTP and SRTCP and, of course, two
separate ICE procedures which bring more complexity (what happens if
the transport for RTCP gets a DTLS error alarm?).

Thanks a lot.

PS: Sorry if the question is too obvious. I still have to take a look
to new topics :)

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Monday, 5 May 2014 23:18:36 UTC