Re: Inactive Specifcation Co-authors

Works for me as well.

_____________
Roman Shpount


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Christoph Dorn <christoph@hookflash.com>
wrote:

> Works for me.
>
> Christoph
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote:
>
>> In an effort to cut down on the amount of "noise" at the top of the spec,
>> I would like to propose one of the following for us "inactive" spec
>> co-authors (myself included):
>>
>> 1. Removal of inactive spec co-authors. The thinking here is that
>> co-authors that are no longer active should likely be removed.  The
>> previous spec where they did contribute will still hold those names.
>>
>> *or*
>>
>> 2. List all inactive spec co-authors under a section at the bottom of the
>> document labeled as "Previous Authors". Maybe just above the current
>> References section would make the most sense?
>>
>> Not trying to create a sh*t storm here, just thinking that its a
>> bit imprecise the way it sits today.
>>
>> Hoping the other co-authors will chime in here.
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway>  | *Hookflash
>> <http://hookflash.com/> * | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/elagerway>  | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/>  *
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:59:13 UTC