Works for me as well. _____________ Roman Shpount On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Christoph Dorn <christoph@hookflash.com> wrote: > Works for me. > > Christoph > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote: > >> In an effort to cut down on the amount of "noise" at the top of the spec, >> I would like to propose one of the following for us "inactive" spec >> co-authors (myself included): >> >> 1. Removal of inactive spec co-authors. The thinking here is that >> co-authors that are no longer active should likely be removed. The >> previous spec where they did contribute will still hold those names. >> >> *or* >> >> 2. List all inactive spec co-authors under a section at the bottom of the >> document labeled as "Previous Authors". Maybe just above the current >> References section would make the most sense? >> >> Not trying to create a sh*t storm here, just thinking that its a >> bit imprecise the way it sits today. >> >> Hoping the other co-authors will chime in here. >> >> /Erik >> >> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash >> <http://hookflash.com/> * | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter >> <http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> * >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:59:13 UTC