Re: Inactive Specifcation Co-authors

For what is worth, I asked Iñaki a couple of weeks ago to get involved 
again in the development of the spec as part as his eface2face duties. 
So he should be active again :)

Best regards
Sergio

P.S. I think that option 2 is fairer with the people that did the 
initial work.

On 19/08/2014 18:08, Erik Lagerway wrote:
> In an effort to cut down on the amount of "noise" at the top of the 
> spec, I would like to propose one of the following for us "inactive" 
> spec co-authors (myself included):
>
> 1. Removal of inactive spec co-authors. The thinking here is that 
> co-authors that are no longer active should likely be removed.  The 
> previous spec where they did contribute will still hold those names.
>
> /or/
>
> 2. List all inactive spec co-authors under a section at the bottom of 
> the document labeled as "Previous Authors". Maybe just above the 
> current References section would make the most sense?
>
> Not trying to create a sh*t storm here, just thinking that its a 
> bit imprecise the way it sits today.
>
> Hoping the other co-authors will chime in here.
>
> /Erik
>
> **Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway>  | **Hookflash 
> <http://hookflash.com/> ** | 1 (855)**Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter 
> <http://twitter.com/elagerway>  | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> **
> ********