- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:17:12 -0400
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-openw3c@w3.org
On August 11, 2014 at 3:51:54 PM, Chris Wilson (cwilso@google.com) wrote: > > Note that I'm not EXACTLY advocating for this; I actually think > directly using living documents in /TR is not a good idea. Can you provide the rationale as to why? > It *IS* > a good idea to make sure /TR documents always POINT to the current > spec or effort (yes, including pointing to editor's drafts). This is what we have today, no? > I think redefining history of specs is bad. Not sure what this means. Can you provide an example? > I think making it clear > - MOST clear - what current status is, is critical. Agree. Knowing status is critical. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 14:17:45 UTC