- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:51:53 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-openw3c@w3.org
Received on Monday, 11 August 2014 19:52:20 UTC
Hey gang. I'm Chris Wilson. Advisory Board member, Web Audio spec editor, troublemaker. Not necessarily in that order. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote: > On August 8, 2014 at 11:05:57 AM, Arthur Barstow (art.barstow@gmail.com) > wrote: > > On 8/5/14 6:21 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > I'd like to change the way things work to allow me to: > > > > > > 1. put living documents on TR > > > 2. have a CC0 license (or cc-by) > > > > Re #1 - this issue is included in the list of AB priorities wiki > > [AB-prios] (I believe it was Chris Wilson that proposed it). I created > > W3Process [Issue-106] to make sure it doesn't get "lost" . Other than > > that, I'm not sure what this group should do about it and I trust you > > will keep the W3Process group "honest" ;-). > Note that I'm not EXACTLY advocating for this; I actually think directly using living documents in /TR is not a good idea. It *IS* a good idea to make sure /TR documents always POINT to the current spec or effort (yes, including pointing to editor's drafts). I think redefining history of specs is bad. I think making it clear - MOST clear - what current status is, is critical. -C
Received on Monday, 11 August 2014 19:52:20 UTC