Re: JSON-LD context for open annotations?

On May 6, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Is it essential that it would be 308?

307 works for me… (but frankly, I thought that 308 was intended to be more like a 302 or 303)

Thanks for fixing this,

Jacco

Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 14:10:17 UTC