Re: Use Cases

Hi Felix,

Thanks for this! Yes, a section on agents involved in the use cases would
be very helpful.  I'll add that in the next iteration. Great suggestion!

I guess, given that internationalization and accessibility are in scope for
provision via annotation, then additional style information would also be
in scope.  In the model it's relatively easy to associate a CSS resource
with some other resource, but there would still need to be some way to
assign the particular class to an element or other selector. Definitely
warrants some investigation :)

Rob


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:

>  Hi Robert,
>
> sorry for the late follow-up on this. I have to add just one question to
> this: in the use case document or a different location, is there a
> description of actors? I was thinking of e.g.
>
>
> 1) content architect: providing annotations for several (potentially
> thousands of documents)
> 2) a content author: using the templates made by content architects and
> adapting them to her needs
> 3) a content quality evaluator: in selected pieces of content making
> exceptions to 1) and 2)
>
> I am mentioning this because I see styling as a kind of annotation, and in
> CSS there are direct technical means that reflect above actors:
>
> 1) CSS stylesheets
> 2) Precedence between css stylesheets; the content author will add a
> stylsheet that is linked in a subsequent position compared to 1) and hence
> has higher precedence
> 3) The HTML "style" attribute
>
> So to serve such roles one needs to define rules for precedence (between
> 1) and 2)) and inheritance (some style information inherits through the
> whole tree, like color; others doesn't, like setting of borders) and
> overriding (the "style" attribute overrides the stylesheet information).
>
> With the comparison to style I also tried to emphasize that above actors
> may not be specific to localization etc., but relevant for annotation in
> general. What do you think?
>
> Thanks for your feedback in advance,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 25.02.14 16:52, schrieb Robert Sanderson:
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>  Thanks for the links to the documents and paper, very interesting work!
>
>  I would propose to expand the scope of section 2.5 to "Accessibility and
> Internationalization Use Cases", and add 2.5.3 with your P10 example from
> the paper.  Would that be sufficient, or do you have time to write up a
> more detailed use case for the document?
>
>  Thanks again,
>
>  Rob
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob, all,
>> You may want to consider work on annotation in the Internationalization
>> Activity, in particular the work of the MLW-LT WG which recently completed
>> the ITS2.0 recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/
>>
>> There is a set of IS2.0 use cases based on current implementations
>> available at:
>> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary
>> and an older set of requirements at:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its2req-20120524/
>>
>> ITS2.0 addresses specific use cases related to the internationalisation
>> and localisation of HTML5 and XML content. It therefore specifically
>> addresses the annotation of the _textual_ content of such content, rather
>> than annotating non-text nodes of the resulting DOM tree. However, to
>> handle the many practical aspects, especially in relation to minimising the
>> impact of annotation on the document, ITS possess a sophisitcated set of
>> annotation patterns to overcome some of the limitation of third party
>> annotations of DOM parsable documents, including a mapping to standoff
>> meta-data in RDF. These patterns are described a bit more explicitly
>> (compared to in the Recommendation) in a recent paper available at:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/images/4/4a/Locfoc13-paper36-cr.pdf
>>
>> I'd be very interest in hearing thoughts from the group on this work and
>> its relation to the annotation use case draft.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24/02/2014 22:52, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> The W3C Digital Publishing Interest Group is going to publish a working
>>> draft of a Note on Annotation use cases in the near future.  I have put a
>>> pre-working draft (whatever that means :) ) of the text up at:
>>>
>>> http://www.openannotation.org/usecases.html
>>>
>>> Any comments, corrections, additions, etc are very welcome!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> P.S. Bob, unfortunately data annotation directly isn't in scope of the
>>> IG work, but I've included it under the embedded resource use case to try
>>> and promote the discussion.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>