W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Use Cases

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:39:56 +0100
Message-ID: <5318426C.2030309@w3.org>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
CC: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Robert,

sorry for the late follow-up on this. I have to add just one question to 
this: in the use case document or a different location, is there a 
description of actors? I was thinking of e.g.


1) content architect: providing annotations for several (potentially 
thousands of documents)
2) a content author: using the templates made by content architects and 
adapting them to her needs
3) a content quality evaluator: in selected pieces of content making 
exceptions to 1) and 2)

I am mentioning this because I see styling as a kind of annotation, and 
in CSS there are direct technical means that reflect above actors:

1) CSS stylesheets
2) Precedence between css stylesheets; the content author will add a 
stylsheet that is linked in a subsequent position compared to 1) and 
hence has higher precedence
3) The HTML "style" attribute

So to serve such roles one needs to define rules for precedence (between 
1) and 2)) and inheritance (some style information inherits through the 
whole tree, like color; others doesn't, like setting of borders) and 
overriding (the "style" attribute overrides the stylesheet information).

With the comparison to style I also tried to emphasize that above actors 
may not be specific to localization etc., but relevant for annotation in 
general. What do you think?

Thanks for your feedback in advance,

Felix

Am 25.02.14 16:52, schrieb Robert Sanderson:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the links to the documents and paper, very interesting work!
>
> I would propose to expand the scope of section 2.5 to "Accessibility 
> and Internationalization Use Cases", and add 2.5.3 with your P10 
> example from the paper.  Would that be sufficient, or do you have time 
> to write up a more detailed use case for the document?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie 
> <mailto:dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Rob, all,
>     You may want to consider work on annotation in the
>     Internationalization Activity, in particular the work of the
>     MLW-LT WG which recently completed the ITS2.0 recommendation:
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/
>
>     There is a set of IS2.0 use cases based on current implementations
>     available at:
>     https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary
>     and an older set of requirements at:
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its2req-20120524/
>
>     ITS2.0 addresses specific use cases related to the
>     internationalisation and localisation of HTML5 and XML content. It
>     therefore specifically addresses the annotation of the _textual_
>     content of such content, rather than annotating non-text nodes of
>     the resulting DOM tree. However, to handle the many practical
>     aspects, especially in relation to minimising the impact of
>     annotation on the document, ITS possess a sophisitcated set of
>     annotation patterns to overcome some of the limitation of third
>     party annotations of DOM parsable documents, including a mapping
>     to standoff meta-data in RDF. These patterns are described a bit
>     more explicitly (compared to in the Recommendation) in a recent
>     paper available at:
>     https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/images/4/4a/Locfoc13-paper36-cr.pdf
>
>     I'd be very interest in hearing thoughts from the group on this
>     work and its relation to the annotation use case draft.
>
>     Regards,
>     Dave
>
>
>
>     On 24/02/2014 22:52, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>
>
>         Dear all,
>
>         The W3C Digital Publishing Interest Group is going to publish
>         a working draft of a Note on Annotation use cases in the near
>         future.  I have put a pre-working draft (whatever that means
>         :) ) of the text up at:
>
>         http://www.openannotation.org/usecases.html
>
>         Any comments, corrections, additions, etc are very welcome!
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Rob
>
>         P.S. Bob, unfortunately data annotation directly isn't in
>         scope of the IG work, but I've included it under the embedded
>         resource use case to try and promote the discussion.
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 09:40:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:38:25 UTC