- From: Edward Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:30:17 -0500
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, "W. Nema" <waleed.nema@gmail.com>, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > So, did you have any examples of what is useful or not useful from a tool perspective? Everything in the current data model is based on use cases and requirements, perhaps not requirements for everyone, but requirements none-the-less. Nope, I was just writing to agree that (more?) library support for working with OA annotations is an important idea. Just saying that some data is in JSON doesn’t mean it’s useful for a particular task. It just means you can call JSON.parse on it (yay) instead of having to install some esoteric RDF toolkit to work with it (boo). //Ed
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 18:30:42 UTC