Re: Friendly JSON serialization (Was: Annotation Serializations)

Yep, I think we're all in agreement :)

(And the greatest of respect and thanks to David for his work as chair of
the RDF 1.1 WG in navigating the politics to get JSON-LD through the system
in a timely and non-destructive fashion!)


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Edward Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So, did you have any examples of what is useful or not useful from a
> tool perspective?  Everything in the current data model is based on use
> cases and requirements, perhaps not requirements for everyone, but
> requirements none-the-less.
>
> Nope, I was just writing to agree that (more?) library support for working
> with OA annotations is an important idea. Just saying that some data is in
> JSON doesn’t mean it’s useful for a particular task. It just means you can
> call JSON.parse on it (yay) instead of having to install some esoteric RDF
> toolkit to work with it (boo).
>
> //Ed