Re: W3C Annotation Working Group?

On 01/08/2014 02:52 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> Please let us know your thoughts on this idea!  While we think that a 
> formal TR will carry significantly more weight than the current 
> community draft, especially with larger industrial potential adopters, 
> and that a broader scope of work can strengthen the market, we want to 
> make sure you agree that the creation of a WG is the right thing to do 
> at this stage. Do you think this is the right step? Would you be 
> interested in participating in this proposed WG? Please give us your 
> comments here!
I am using OA as a key technology for annotating knowledge useful for 
medication safety. As we make progress on the use cases we have chosen, 
there may be contributions that advance the standard. Would it be more 
useful for me to participate in the WG should it be formed of the CG?

TY,
-Rich

-- 
Richard D Boyce, PhD
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics
Faculty, Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing
Faculty, Geriatric Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Gero-Informatics Research and Training Program
University of Pittsburgh
rdb20@pitt.edu
Office: 412-648-9219
Twitter: @bhaapgh