- From: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:40:11 -0400
- To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/core.html#ProvAgents carries prov:SoftwareAgent carries [...] "It might also be used for the object of the oa:annotatedBy for machine learning generated annotations." Well, yes it might. But the sentence would be just as correct, with less of a prescriptive feel, if "learning" were omitted. It seems odd to have such a needlessly specific example. Symmetric discourse here would be "It would typically be used for the object of the oa:annotatedBy for machine generated annotations. Bob -- Robert A. Morris Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390 IT Staff Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard University email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram === The content of this communication is made entirely on my own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or Harvard University.
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 03:40:39 UTC