W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Last draft comment: Core

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:40:17 +0100
Message-ID: <510F9011.3060108@few.vu.nl>
To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On 2/4/13 2:06 AM, Paolo Ciccarese wrote:
>
>
>      > 4. Mapping to Dublin Core in 2.2
>      > In an earlier version oa:annotatedBy (resp. oa:annotatedAt, oa:serializedBy)
>      > was mapped to dcterms:creator (resp. dcterms:created, dcterms:publisher. I'm
>      > not sure why these mappings were removed, as they seem quite right and the
>      > mapping to PROV does not really replace them.
>
>     The decision was to remove them, I don't recall the exact rationale,
>     other than to try to stick more closely to W3C standards where ever
>     possible, and to not confuse the matter by having multiple mappings.
>
>
> That was the reason I recall. And I would still be of the same advice.
>
>
>
>      > 5. Relation between oa:semanticTagging and oa:tagging in 2.3
>
>      > I support Stian's interrogation (and his implicit proposal) at
>      > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openannotation/2013Feb/0002.html
>      > "oa:semanticTagging is skos:narrowerThan (?) oa:tagging"
>      > The spec should reflect that
>      > oa:semanticTagging skos:narrower oa:tagging
>      > otherwise it may be difficult to convince implementers to create semantic
>      > relations for their motivation extensions.
>
>     Sure. The more broadly usable motivations with clear use cases in the
>     spec rather than having to be defined elsewhere, the better.
>
>
> Wasn't Stian also mentioning some constraints:
> "This means that in this semantic tagging I can't also include oa:hasBody to "classic" bodies."
>
> Do we consider those valid?
> Figure 2.1.3.2. Semantic Tag is based on oa:tagging
> I feel more explanations are needed for oa:semanticTagging.


Yes I'm also not so sure about all this. As I pointed out yesterday (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openannotation/2013Feb/0019.html) I don't understand why the current semantic tagging pattern would disallow including "classic" bodies next to semantic tags.

Antoine.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 10:40:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:38:22 UTC