- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:46:31 -0600
- To: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Tim, If you could explain your requirements and/or use cases in a little more detail, we may be in a better position to help. Dublin Core and FOAF are definitely mainstays of semantic markup, but serve in a very different capacity to Open Annotation. DC and FOAF describe resources, whereas OA is primarily concerned with the relationships between resources. Thanks! Rob On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Can someone point me to the most recent best practices for using all > these options for semantic markup? > > My primary project is healthcare related and as such I use mostly > controlled vocabularies for semantics. However, we do deal with real > people in a real world and DCMI has been my go-to preference here. I > recently found OA and now I am struggling to get through the noise to > see how best to mark up my constraint definitions (expressed as XML > Schema files). > > Thanks for your feedback. > > --Tim > > > > -- > ============================================ > Timothy Cook, MSc +55 21 94711995 > MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org > LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook > Skype ID == timothy.cook > Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook > >
Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 15:47:03 UTC