Re: OA, DCMI, FOAF; Oh My!

Hi Rob,

Thanks.  With a little more study I have realized that DC and FOAF are
the correct ones to use.  What I am identifying are resources (XML
Schemas) that define concepts in healthcare.


Cheers,
Tim




On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> If you could explain your requirements and/or use cases in a little
> more detail, we may be in a better position to help.  Dublin Core and
> FOAF are definitely mainstays of semantic markup, but serve in a very
> different capacity to Open Annotation.  DC and FOAF describe
> resources, whereas OA is primarily concerned with the relationships
> between resources.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rob
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Timothy Cook
> <timothywayne.cook@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can someone point me to the most recent best practices for using all
>> these options for semantic markup?
>>
>> My primary project is healthcare related and as such I use mostly
>> controlled vocabularies for semantics.  However, we do deal with real
>> people in a real world and DCMI has been my go-to preference here.  I
>> recently found OA and now I am struggling to get through the noise to
>> see how best to mark up my constraint definitions (expressed as XML
>> Schema files).
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> --Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ============================================
>> Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
>> MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
>> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
>> Skype ID == timothy.cook
>> Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook
>>
>>



-- 
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Skype ID == timothy.cook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook

Received on Monday, 30 July 2012 19:36:15 UTC