Re: OA Open Issues and Focus Groups

Hi Leyla,

I put Stian's name there, regarding his suggestion to deprecate structured
bodies and only have references to external graphs.

Herbert and I are (of course) very interested in the issue too, and
hopefully it will be informed by the resolution of the multiple-body issue.

Rob

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Leyla Jael García Castro <
leylajael@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> @ Stian Soiland-Reyes and Tom Habing: I just saw you are working on
> Semantic/Graph annotations. Do you already have a document to share? I
> would like to know more about the discussion around this particular subject.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Leyla
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>> For those of you not on Tuesday's OA Community Group conference call, I
>> wanted to call your attention to the 'Focus Group' agenda item from the
>> call and to the Open Issues wiki page (
>> http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Open_Issues). ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The Open Issue page is helping us track issue discussions and concrete
>> proposals for modifications to the Core and Extension Specifications such
>> as are currently being discussed on this listserv. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Focus Groups: Most Open Issues list one or more individuals who have been
>> tasked with creating a wiki page summarizing issue discussions and laying
>> out any consensus recommendation(s) for action (or inaction)  needed to
>> resolve a particular issue.  See for example:
>> http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Style ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In order to make the upcoming f2f meeting in Chicago as productive as
>> possible, we are asking issue 'Focus Groups' to post pages (and notify
>> using this listserv) by no later than  5 September. This will provide time
>> for Community comment prior to finalizing meeting agenda. Typical issue
>> recommendations / resolutions that we expect to emerge from this process:
>> ****
>>
>> **·         **discussion concluded, no action required; ****
>>
>> **·         **no spec change required, but propose adding text to FAQ or
>> examples to Cookbook; ****
>>
>> **·         **keep issue open while new properties and/or classes are
>> suggested and considered; ****
>>
>> **·         **make a specific change to the one or both specification
>> documents.****
>>
>> This list of kinds of recommendations is not comprehensive.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Process is informal by design and please feel free to join in – add your
>> name, add an issue. All OA Community Group members should be able to edit
>> wiki pages. But we do ask that you not get carried away, either by
>> proposing too many new issues or by trying to be part of every single Focus
>> Group. Concentrate on the most important, highest priority – the biggest
>> bang for your time and effort. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> See also the Conference Call notes that have been posted (
>> http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Telcon_2012-08-14)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Tim Cole****
>>
>> University of Illinois at UC****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>