- From: Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 11:13:32 +0100
- To: public-ontolex@w3.org
Thank you very much. I found the dcterms:coverage property used here https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85038615.rdf Using location for my case (https://schema.org/location or the LOCN vocabulary) is controversial as I need to indicate the geographic areas the data in the ontology concerns, rather than objects located in these areas. CL On 08/11/24 10:54, John McCrae wrote: > Hi, > > One suggestion could be to use schema.org's location property: > > https://schema.org/location > > Similarly, you could use Wikidata's location property (P131) and link > to Wikidata as this link you up with the largest collection of linked > data. > > Alternatively, there was a paper a few years ago that talked about > using very specific language tags: > > https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/01oasics/oasics-vol070-ldk2019/OASIcs.LDK.2019.4/OASIcs.LDK.2019.4.pdf > > > Regards, > > John > > On 07/11/2024 18:16, Cristiano Longo wrote: >> I'm writing down an Ontolex-lemon based dataset enumerating lemmas of >> some Gallo-Italian varieties spoken in two specific towns. As the >> language is Gallo-Italian in general, I would like to be more >> specific with attacching geographic information about these two towns >> to the Lexicon individual. I searched in Dublin Core and Void for a >> property to associate geographic data to a datased, but I havent >> found anything relevant. >> >> Any suggestion is welcome, thanks in advance. >> >> CL >> >> >
Received on Friday, 8 November 2024 10:13:43 UTC