- From: Fahad Khan <fahad.khan@ilc.cnr.it>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:08:38 +0200
- To: Flavia Sciolette <flavia.sciolette@ilc.cnr.it>
- Cc: public-ontolex@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK+N+9j=QUOE5a8NCAf3nwwJ_ajDWQjZryHZaaXcjvhkDy0AqA@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Flavia, DiminuitiveNoun exists as a class in lexinfo. The others don't, but you can open a new issue <https://github.com/ontolex/lexinfo/issues> on the lexinfo github suggesting them as additions to the ontology. Cheers Fahad Il giorno mar 11 apr 2023 alle ore 16:58 Flavia Sciolette < flavia.sciolette@ilc.cnr.it> ha scritto: > Dear all, > > I write this email to ask for your advice. I am working on a > conversion of a lexical resource for Italian in an ontolex-compliant > format. This starting resource describes lemmas and associated forms, > some of which are derived with suffixes (e.g. for the diminutive or > the pejorative). This kind of form is described with a feature and > associated values: “dim” for diminutive, “end” for endearment, “pej” > for pejorative, and “aug” for augmentative. I am having some trouble > with the conversion of these values to define forms. I set out to use > Lexinfo, but, to the best of my knowledge, I have not found exact > equivalents. I thought about using a sub-property of morphosyntactic > properties but first wanted to figure out if there was a way to use a > popular vocabulary like Lexinfo, rather than maintaining > resource-specific values. I apologize for this possibly naive concern. > > Thank you in advance. > > Flavia Sciolette > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2023 16:08:49 UTC