Re: morph module telco 20/11/18 minutes

Hi Bettina,

thanks a lot for the minutes. Quick question: Any place where we can
deposit examples? I would like to put some emphasis on the Old High German
dictionary of Splett (
https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=sbsgAAAAQBAJ) because of its
richness. For example, it provides tree structures rather than just
morpheme-level features. (While this would be an interesting feature for
NLP, as well, Splett is a traditional philologist without any ties to
computation.)

Best,
Christian


Am Fr., 23. Nov. 2018 um 22:40 Uhr schrieb Bettina Klimek <
klimek@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to share with you the minutes of the first telco regarding
> the morphology module. Unfortunately, many people who liked to participate
> could not join, so it was only Julia, Max, Jorge and me exchanging our
> thoughts on the central issue for the next telcos, i.e. what is the
> purpose/content of the module? Below I copied the minutes for you:
>
> Minutes:
>
> Julia:
>
> Assumed that module should be glue between mmoon and ontolex
>
> Would like Bettina to create reduced version of mmoon as starting point
>
> Max:
>
> Still issues and examples that need to be taken into account in modelling
>
> Have flex and toolbox data - share it please
>
> Jorge:
>
> Collect representation needs that justifies adding this module
>
> MMoOn very large and complex - try to produce minimal modules covering the
> maximum
>
> Julia: are issues in Wiki issues found in dictionaries (contradiction to
> issues listed afterwards)?
>
> At which linguistic levels do these issues generally occur (lexical,
> syntactic level)?
>
> Max: yes in arabic dictionaries word-forms are listed as well
>
> Bettina: narrow scope to lexicographic needs or open widen scope to
> grammatical and morphological analysis?
>
> Max: against wide scope. Just representation of morphemes in relation to
> lexical entries, don’t represent meanings of morphemes in the module rather
> point to sense outside of module
>
> The opinions refer to point #3 in the following document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TmPIIugIBGGjakC62esTNIq6O6FQl4cl_wwsyEp6LYU/edit?usp=sharing
> where I copied John's definition of the purpose from the wiki page (
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Morphology) that served as a
> starting point.
>
> We all agreed that this is an import issue which requires more community
> input. *Even if you cannot join the calls, please, share your thoughts,
> expectations and requirements that you personally see as the purpose of
> this module.* At the moment we are collecting also every kind of example
> data (RDF and non-RDF) that you would like to share or that illustrates
> what kind of needs you have regarding the content and modelling. Send your
> example data to me via e-mail and I will collect everything in an extra
> document which we can use as the basis for the discussion for the future
> telcos.
>
> Also, I would like you to know that I drafted the procedure I am planning
> to follow in the creation of this new OntoLex module. You can find it in
> the document link above.
>
> Looking forward to your input on the purpose of the module and your
> example data :)
>
> All the best,
>
> Bettina
>
>
> --
> Bettina Klimek
> PhD Student
> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
> Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI)
> Goerdelerring 9
> 04109 Leipzig
>
> Research Group: http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
> Homepage: http://aksw.org/BettinaKlimek
> Projects: http://mmoon.org, http://linguistics.okfn.org
> Events: 12th May 2018 "LDL 2018 : 6th Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics (LDL-2018): Towards Linguistic Data Science"
>         http://ldl2018.linguistic-lod.org/
>
>