- From: Christian Chiarcos <chiarcos@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:23:47 +0100
- To: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Cc: "christian.chiarcos@web.de" <christian.chiarcos@web.de>
Dear all, just a clarification question: In my understanding, the existing notion of "(Syntactic)Frame" in lemon focuses on valency frames (as in [the syntactic component of] VerbNet), but it is not systematically being applied to frame semantics (PropBank, FrameNet).* Is this correct, and if so, do you think that the consensus would be rather pointing to see semantic frames as something beyond the scope of lemon (there are very good reasons, e.g., FrameNet does not really focus on lexical entries ~ individual predicates), or towards extending the existing specifications ? Thanks, Christian * I know that frame semantics is a topic for a lot of people in the group, and also that already lemonUby included a rudimentary FrameNet model in Monnet-lemon, but this is not reflected in the community report -- and existing FrameNet representations in RDF seem to diverge rather than to tend towards a uniform (not to mention, lemon-based) representation -- in particular if the intended application includes reasoning. -- Prof. Dr. Christian Chiarcos Applied Computational Linguistics Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt a. M. 60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany office: Robert-Mayer-Str. 10, #401b mail: chiarcos@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de web: http://acoli.cs.uni-frankfurt.de tel: +49-(0)69-798-22463 fax: +49-(0)69-798-28931
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2018 12:24:17 UTC