- From: John McCrae <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:38:06 +0100
- To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC5njqqB9K0jfhU_nuEqs-jDgDrJPqCkPhfhRWVYhOaO_+ZLVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, The minutes from today are below: Present: Julia, Francesca, Ilan, John https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Lexicography Issues raised by Sander: JBG: Use of two properties describesEntry and describesSense, but dictionaries describe much more than entries and senses. JBG: Single describes property with multiple range? JBG:Is this sufficient to capture the structure of a dictionary JM: Probably sufficent, but some risk of not capturing all dictionaries One property with multiple ranges may be more flexible than multiple properties Technical distinction between ranges of 'describes' but is there a semantic distinction? JM: probably technically okay to have a single property JBG: SuperEntry of subEntry? JM: I think this is an error in my minutes. It should be SuperEntry FF: We aren't representing a digital version of a print dictionary, so is dictionary entry the right name? JBG: if a dictionary entry only has senses for nouns ontolex core is sufficient. however the dictionary has senses for multiple pos I must use DictionaryEntry. The use of dictionary entry implies the existence of a paper dictionary. JM: super entry is like an 'entry group' (as previously proposed) so perhaps SuperEntry is a better name FF: shows that lexical entries do not occur by themselves IK: what is meant by typographical? what is the purpose of lexicography module? aims is to represent linguistic information (JM: broadly true) JBG: yeah, some things are not linguistic, but somehow logical, e.g., sense orderings JBG: In next telco we should repeat the goal of the module Key Points: 'describe' as a property with multiple ranges is acceptable 'SuperEntry' is a better name than 'LexicalEntry' goal of OntoLex is not same as TEI IK: how this relates to dictionaries. What about senses, when many lexicographers (e.g., Kilgariff) reject them? JBG: we provide enough tools to represent dictionaries JM: OntoLex is quite opinionated as to what 'entries' and 'senses' mean, so we need to bridge this with other representations IK: Looking at future goals is important too. 'SuperEntry' is more forward-looking Next Telco: 23rd is difficult for some so postpone to 30 Apr, 13:00 CEST. Regards, John
Received on Monday, 9 April 2018 12:38:33 UTC