RE: OntoLex minutes 26/3 from Katrien Depuydt on 2018-04-05 (public-ontolex@w3.org from April 2018)

From: Katrien Depuydt <Katrien.Depuydt@ivdnt.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 06:31:08 +0000
To: 'John McCrae' <john@mccr.ae>
CC: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5A7D83253ADC0C469FB6EC7C124BD9FA05101B@svprex10>

Hi,

Fine.
In the Google doc, on the last page, I have put my homework.

Kind regards,
Katrien

Lic. Katrien Depuydt
senior onderzoeker/taalkundige
senior researcher/linguist
+31 (0)71 527 2479 +31 (0)6 53627318 / kamer 104

/instituut voor de Nederlandse taal/
Rapenburg 61 / 2311 GJ / Leiden
Postbus 9515 / 2300 RA / Leiden

www.ivdnt.org

Van: johnmccrae@gmail.com [mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com] Namens John McCrae
Verzonden: dinsdag 3 april 2018 15:30
Aan: Katrien Depuydt
CC: public-ontolex
Onderwerp: Re: OntoLex minutes 26/3

Hi Katrien, all,

I don't think we confirmed a time for the next meeting, but following the schedule, our next call should be:

9th April at 13:00 CEST

Are there any objections?

Regards,
John

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Katrien Depuydt <Katrien.Depuydt@ivdnt.org<mailto:Katrien.Depuydt@ivdnt.org>> wrote:
Hi John,

Thank you for the minutes.
When I the next call scheduled?

Kind regards,
Katrien

Lic. Katrien Depuydt
senior onderzoeker/taalkundige
senior researcher/linguist
+31 (0)71 527 2479<tel:+31%2071%20527%202479> +31 (0)6 53627318 / kamer 104

/instituut voor de Nederlandse taal/
Rapenburg 61 / 2311 GJ / Leiden<https://maps.google.com/?q=Rapenburg+61+/+2311+GJ+/+Leiden+%0D%0A+Postbus+6515&entry=gmail&source=g>
Postbus 6515<https://maps.google.com/?q=Rapenburg+61+/+2311+GJ+/+Leiden+%0D%0A+Postbus+6515&entry=gmail&source=g> / 2300 RA / Leiden

ivdnt.org<http://ivdnt.org>

This message shall not constitute any obligations.
This message is intended solely for the addressee.
If you have received this message in error, please
inform us and delete the message.

Van: johnmccrae@gmail.com<mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com> [mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com<mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com>] Namens John McCrae
Verzonden: maandag 26 maart 2018 14:10
Aan: public-ontolex
Onderwerp: OntoLex minutes 26/3

Hi all,

These are the minutes from today's telco:

Regards,
John

Present: Julia, John, Ilan, Fahad, Jorge, Francesca
Discussion of intensional vs extensional modelling
AP John: modelling example for manners. Issue 1
AP Katrien: modelling example using extensional modelling
Issue 3 insufficient data. CLOSE
Issue 4: why link to lexical entries?
John: Two properties describes sense/entry?
Francesca: why link to senses? Julia: better resembles dictionary entry
Suggest a new property linking dictionary entry component to lexical entry.
Better models dictionary entry
Why "describes"? Julia : from CSV table
- describesEntry/describesSense
- Specify entry and describe sense?
- use as working names?
Fahad: why not have a super-entry as name of dictionary entry? (as in TEI)
- can include homograph in a dictionary entry? Julia: yes
- super-entry as name for dictionary entry? Is the name confusing: lexical vs dictionary entry.
- Ilan: dictionary in the name is confusing
Number of "dictionary entries" overall is important commercially but not academically
Dictionary entry to be used only when needed? Julia: this may be clearer if it is called super entry.
Does counting dictionary entries just give the number of entries in the dictionary?
Ilan: dictionary publishers are vague about what an entry is

Summary:
Add property between dictionary entry and lexical entry
Dictionary entries could be renamed to sub entry
Dictionary entries to be used only when needed
Dictentry also points to lexical entry

Lexical entry is a subclass of dictionary entry?
- follows precedent of synsem
- sometimes lexical entry and dictionary entry are the same thing.

________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------
Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
Het bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
Indien het bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij
u dit aan ons te melden en het bericht te verwijderen.

This message shall not constitute any obligations.
This message is intended solely for the addressee.
If you have received this message in error, please
inform us and delete the message.
----------------------------------------------------------

________________________________

Received on Friday, 6 April 2018 00:22:20 UTC