Re: OntoLex minutes 26/3

Hi Katrien, all,

I don't think we confirmed a time for the next meeting, but following the
schedule, our next call should be:

9th April at 13:00 CEST

Are there any objections?

Regards,
John

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Katrien Depuydt <Katrien.Depuydt@ivdnt.org
> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the minutes.
>
> When I the next call scheduled?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Katrien
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Lic. Katrien Depuydt
> senior onderzoeker/taalkundige
>
> senior researcher/linguist
>
> +31 (0)71 527 2479 <+31%2071%20527%202479> +31 (0)6 53627318 / kamer 104
>
>
>
> */instituut voor de Nederlandse taal/*
>
> Rapenburg 61 / 2311 GJ / Leiden
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Rapenburg+61+/+2311+GJ+/+Leiden+%0D%0A+Postbus+6515&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> Postbus 6515
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Rapenburg+61+/+2311+GJ+/+Leiden+%0D%0A+Postbus+6515&entry=gmail&source=g>
> / 2300 RA / Leiden
>
>
>
> ivdnt.org
>
>
>
>
>
> This message shall not constitute any obligations.
>
> This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> If you have received this message in error, please
> inform us and delete the message.
>
>
>
> *Van:* johnmccrae@gmail.com [mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com] *Namens *John
> McCrae
> *Verzonden:* maandag 26 maart 2018 14:10
> *Aan:* public-ontolex
> *Onderwerp:* OntoLex minutes 26/3
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> These are the minutes from today's telco:
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
>
>
> Present: Julia, John, Ilan, Fahad, Jorge, Francesca
> Discussion of intensional vs extensional modelling
> AP John: modelling example for manners. Issue 1
> AP Katrien: modelling example using extensional modelling
> Issue 3 insufficient data. CLOSE
> Issue 4: why link to lexical entries?
> John: Two properties describes sense/entry?
> Francesca: why link to senses? Julia: better resembles dictionary entry
> Suggest a new property linking dictionary entry component to lexical entry.
> Better models dictionary entry
> Why "describes"? Julia : from CSV table
> - describesEntry/describesSense
> - Specify entry and describe sense?
> - use as working names?
> Fahad: why not have a super-entry as name of dictionary entry? (as in TEI)
> - can include homograph in a dictionary entry? Julia: yes
> - super-entry as name for dictionary entry? Is the name confusing: lexical
> vs dictionary entry.
> - Ilan: dictionary in the name is confusing
> Number of "dictionary entries" overall is important commercially but not
> academically
> Dictionary entry to be used only when needed? Julia: this may be clearer
> if it is called super entry.
> Does counting dictionary entries just give the number of entries in the
> dictionary?
> Ilan: dictionary publishers are vague about what an entry is
>
> Summary:
> Add property between dictionary entry and lexical entry
> Dictionary entries could be renamed to sub entry
> Dictionary entries to be used only when needed
> Dictentry also points to lexical entry
>
> Lexical entry is a subclass of dictionary entry?
> - follows precedent of synsem
> - sometimes lexical entry and dictionary entry are the same thing.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
> Het bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
> Indien het bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij
> u dit aan ons te melden en het bericht te verwijderen.
>
> This message shall not constitute any obligations.
> This message is intended solely for the addressee.
> If you have received this message in error, please
> inform us and delete the message.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>