- From: Thierry Declerck <declerck@dfki.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:07:25 +0200
- To: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b6a1495f-91c4-30a4-1f5e-795c1d4e0f90@dfki.de>
Dear Jorge, Philipp, All, In the meantime, there was a change in my schedules, and I am landing in Vienna at 14:30. I will thus not be able to join the telco at 15:00, sorry for that. But as both John and Philipp have been attending and commenting our poster at eLex (work on "lemonizing" the Ducht General Dictionary), and we had there a nice small OntoLex-lemon session then, maybe they can convey today at the telco what we discussed ? Many thanks!! Best Thierry Am 25.09.2017 um 18:56 schrieb Jorge Gracia: > Dear Philipp, all, > > Let me add a couple of comments to the agenda that I hope will be > useful for tomorrow's discussion > > > 1) Goals of the lexicography module > > In the paper we presented at the Ontolex WS at LDK'17 we tried to > motivate it [1]. In my view, the goal of the module can be summarised > as follows: to complement (the core of) OntoLex and overcome its > limitations when modelling lexicographic information as linked data, > in a way that is agnostic of the underlying lexicographic view and > minimises information loss. > > > > 2) Lexicography module: modelling existing dictionaries or providing > > a conceptual / abstract model of language and linguistic objects ? > > I think that we should cover both targets. After analysing the > literature, we perceive an obvious need for reaching some agreements > that allows for a better and more interoperable migration of existing > dictionaries into LD. For example, Oxford has their own notion of > "dictionary entry" [2] materialised in the "ogl:Entry" class while we > introduced the ad-hoc "kd:dictionaryEntry" relation in the conversion > of the KD global series dictionaries [3], and more people will > introduce their own solutions as well to cover similar notions. Being > interoperability a key issue in LD technologies, it makes a lot of > sense to build a common space in which these things can be agreed and > commonly defined, for which the Ontolex community is a natural forum. > > However, although the primary goal might be to model existing > dictionaries, this can be done by extracting what they have in common > and in a way that is decoupled from specific linguistic views. Thus, > the new module should remain highly re-usable across dictionaries, as > well as useful for new LD-based dictionaries built from scratch. We > asume of course that many specific ingredients from specific > dictionaries and views will still need ad-hoc constructs, but having a > few common entities defined in the module will help to overcome the > limitations that have been detected when current OntoLex is applied to > lexicographic data, and can greatly benefit interoperability. > > Best regards, > Jorge > > [1] "We ground our proposal for a lexicography module on the following > four points: (1) the use of OntoLex by the majority of the community > to convert linguistic resources to LLD instead of to lexicalize > ontologies, (2) the nature of lemon being descriptive but not > prescriptive and the respect towards different lexicographic views, > (3) the coming together of the lexicography and the Semantic Web > communities and potential benefits that LLD may bring about to > lexicography, assuming it involves no information loss, and (4) the > reuse of already available mechanisms in OntoLex." (see > http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1899/OntoLex_2017_paper_5.pdf) > > [2] See http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2016/pdf/523_Paper.pdf > > [3] See > http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2016/workshops/LREC2016Workshop-GLOBALEX_Proceedings-v2.pdf > > 2017-09-21 9:54 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano > <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>: > > Dear all, > > an email from elex, which is being really interesting. > > I want to propose to have our next teleconference on Tuesday 26th at > 15:00 CEST. > > The topics I want to discuss, raised during last telco: > > 1) Goals of the lexicography module > > 2) Lexicography module: modelling existing dictionaries or providing > a conceptual / abstract model of language and linguistic objects ? > > 3) Process to follow to define the lexicography module > > Best regards, > > Philipp. > > > -- > -- > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > AG Semantic Computing > Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > Universität Bielefeld > > Tel: +49 521 106 12249 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249> > Fax: +49 521 106 6560 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560> > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> > > Office CITEC-2.307 > Universitätsstr. 21-25 > 33615 Bielefeld, NRW > Germany > > > > > > -- > Jorge Gracia, PhD > Ontology Engineering Group > Artificial Intelligence Department > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > http://jogracia.url.ph/web/ -- Thierry Declerck, Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Language Technology Lab Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3 D-66123 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58 Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38 email: declerck@dfki.de ------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH Firmensitz: Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 -------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 07:07:56 UTC