- From: John McCrae <john@mccr.ae>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:34:46 +0000
- To: Gilles Sérasset <Gilles.Serasset@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 16:35:55 UTC
Hi Gilles, There are plans to make LexInfo aware of OntoLex, so you don't need to update your URLs. There is no problem with an entry being both a lemon:LexicalEntry and an ontolex:LexicalEntry, in fact this is probably even a good thing! Regards, John PS. BTW I implemented a converter a while back if you wish to try it: https://github.com/jmccrae/lemon-monnet2w3c On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Gilles Sérasset < Gilles.Serasset@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was just trying to do a quick and (hopefully no so) dirty migration of > DBnary from legacy Lemon model to the current version of Ontolex. > > However, as I am extensively using the lexinfo ontology, I was wondering > if I had to switch to an "ontolex aware" lexinfo. But when I looked at the > currently available ontology on lexinfo.net, it only mentions the lemon > prefix (http://lemon-model.net/lemon#) and no ontolex prefix ( > http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#). > > Is this normal, shouldn't it refer to the ontolex prefix to subclass the > ontolex lexical entry class ? > > In certain language I was stating : > > :lexentry1 a lexinfo:Adverb > > which implied > :lexentry1 a lemon:Word > and > :lexentry1 a lemon:LexicalEntry > > How can I imply > :lexentry1 a ontolex:Word ? > > Thanks in advance, > > Gilles, >
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 16:35:55 UTC