Re: regular date for telecons

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:44 AM, John McCrae <john@mccr.ae> wrote:

>
>    1. Lexico-syntactic categories: That is all the categories such as
>    part-of-speech, gender, case, etc. should be standardised by some procedure
>    agreed by the community. Currently this is done by LexInfo but the process
>    for proposing and correcting changes should be more open.
>    2. Morphology Module: The Monnet Lemon model had a morphology module,
>    but it was seen as quite insufficient and was not widely adopted. A better
>    system for modelling morphology, perhaps based on Bettina Klimek's MoOn
>    ontology could help in some use cases
>    3. Diachronic (historical) Module: The OntoLex Lemon model has no real
>    way of representing etymology or historical usages of terms. I believe
>    there were some suggestions in this direction from both Fahad Khan and
>    Christian Chiarcos.
>
> I'm interested in all of these, particularly morphology.

By way of background, as I'm a first-time poster: I'm a long-time web
developer and standards participant (and early RDF implementor) who's
background is in linguistics. I work on Ancient Greek tagged corpora and
lexica with a particular interest in machine-actionable representation of
morphological information (see, for example, <
https://www.academia.edu/18816954/A_Morphological_Lexicon_of_New_Testament_Greek
>).

James