Re: regular date for telecons

Hi all,

I think the most requested features for OntoLex Lemon (at least to my
knowledge) are as follows:


   1. Lexico-syntactic categories: That is all the categories such as
   part-of-speech, gender, case, etc. should be standardised by some procedure
   agreed by the community. Currently this is done by LexInfo but the process
   for proposing and correcting changes should be more open.
   2. Morphology Module: The Monnet Lemon model had a morphology module,
   but it was seen as quite insufficient and was not widely adopted. A better
   system for modelling morphology, perhaps based on Bettina Klimek's MoOn
   ontology could help in some use cases
   3. Diachronic (historical) Module: The OntoLex Lemon model has no real
   way of representing etymology or historical usages of terms. I believe
   there were some suggestions in this direction from both Fahad Khan and
   Christian Chiarcos.

Regards,
John

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es> wrote:

> Dear Philipp,
>
> > I propose we move the teleconference to the new year to January 12th,
> 16:00 CET
>
> Fine with me
>
> > Meanwhile, I would like to prepare the teleconference by asking you all
> to share some thought on modules or
> > extensions to the ontolex model you would like to see discussed in the
> group next year.
>
> As suggested in a previous email, I'd like to propose a module for
> lexicography [1]. We could analyse how to proceed with this in the next
> telco.
>
> Best regards, and happy Christmas holidays,
>
> Jorge
>
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ontolex/2016Nov/0014.html
>
>
>
> --
> Jorge Gracia, PhD
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Artificial Intelligence Department
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
> http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
>