Re: progress on release of first specification of ontolex

Hi Philipp,

Indeed, language identifiers are usually problematic.

> On 05 Nov 2015, at 10:03, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> 
> And one small thing:
> 
> in many examples we use the dublin core terms property "language" to express language information.
> 
> Sometimes we use "eng" and "en" as language identifier (local name) with respect to the LOC and LEXVO datasets.
> 
> It seems to me that there are some mistakes here.
> 
> It seems that LOC uses "eng" and LEXVO uses "en".
> 
> For instance:
> 
> http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/eng -> does not resolve property, while

 http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/en <http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/en> only contains a "sameAs" link to lexvo:iso639-3/eng <http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-3/eng> (http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/eng <http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/eng>).

The 3-letter id being the one with attached information.

In DBnary I personally chose to always use iso639-3 (3-letter codes) to identify languages. 

What may also be seen is that on the lexvo web site, the lexvo prefix does not include the iso639-3 part.

Maybe examples should use the 639-3 prefix mot be coherent with LOC.

Regards,

Gilles,

> http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/en -> does resolve
> 
> On the other hand:
> 
> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/en -> does not resolve, while
> 
> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/eng -> does resolve
> 
> Thus, in all examples we should use:
> 
> lexvo:en and loc:eng to indicate language information.
> 
> A minor thing, but still...
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Philipp.
> 
> 
> 
> Am 05.11.15 um 09:38 schrieb Philipp Cimiano:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> apologies for my silence in the last weeks. I have been distracted by many other things in October. Now I am working on the release of the ontolex spec with high priority. I have worked through all the normative sections of the specification. There are smaller issues that I will clarify with the main stakeholders of these modules directly.
>> 
>> It is now time to have a final check of the spec if you want.
>> 
>> I am confident that I will finish the thorough check of the model in the next few weeks.
>> 
>> I will then give all the opportunity of doing a final check in the first two weeks of December.
>> 
>> We will then release the specification of the model this year.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Philipp.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
> 
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> 
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
> 
>