W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > May 2015

Re: synsem module ready

From: Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:41:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGDmdGj=pPaPYsbPXYkZKE7Pj3=UcAV5=LqUw-VZH8=igSFxBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Dear Philipp, All

you can find my comments on the synsem module below.

In Example synsem/example2, the resource :own_frame_transitive is wrongly
written :own_form_transitive.  Additionally, there are two usages of
owl:subPropertyOf, which instead  should be rdfs:subPropertyOf.

The class synsem:SemanticFrame is declared to be subclass of
ontolex:LexicalSense; however, in the picture representing the synsem
module, the arrow representing this axiom is oriented in the opposite
direction.

In the paragraph "Semantic Frames", there is a table headed "Type",
"Predicate", "Example", whose first row contains *City(x)*, ?x rdf:type
ontology:Person: should it be ?x rdf:type dbpedia-owl:City?

There is no example (just below the definition of synsem:isA)about the
representation of unary predicates. Nor is there any example about the
representation of individuals.

The definitions of synsem:{subj|obj}OfProp use the following wording:
"...property represents the semantic argument with represents"

I would avoid a sequence of two "represents". Moreover, I think that "with"
should be "that".

In Example synsem/example3, there is again owl:subPropertyOf.

Also, In Example synsem/example4, there is again owl:subPropertyOf.

In the section "Complex Senses / Semantic Frames", there is the definition
of synsem:subframe, while in the figure there is the property
synsem:subsense.

Just below Example synsem/example7, there is an example involving the
property father: the property should point to the child; however, the name
of the property suggests to me that the object is the father (just in the
same manner skos:broader points to the broader of a given concept).

I think that Example synsem/example9  should be explained in more detail.

I didn't find the definition of synsem:propertyDomain and
synsem:propertyRange; then, I realized that they were moved to the core
module. The diagram of the core module must be updated to include these
properties, as well as the diagram of the synsem module to remove them.

I noticed that in the infobox providing the definition of propertyRange and
propertyDomain, the URI still uses the synsem namespace instead of the core
ontolex namespace.

Finally, I noticed a typo in the definition of ontolex:LexicalEntry:
"The class lexical entry represents a unit of analysis of the lexicon that
consist of a set of forms that are grammatically ... "

It should be "that consists" with an append "s".

Best Regards

Manuel Fiorelli

2015-05-13 21:47 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
:

> Dear all,
>
>  I have been working on finalizing the synsem module, please check:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification#Syntax_and_Semantics_.28synsem.29
>
> The next telco to discuss the synsem module will be on Friday the 22nd of
> Mai, 16:00 CET.
>
> Please send me any issues to discuss or comments on the synsem module by
> Thurday 21st of Mai at the very latest.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Philipp.
>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 18 May 2015 08:42:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:49 UTC