Re: synsem module ready

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Dear Philipp, All
>
> you can find my comments on the synsem module below.
>
> In Example synsem/example2, the resource :own_frame_transitive is wrongly
> written :own_form_transitive.  Additionally, there are two usages of
> owl:subPropertyOf, which instead  should be rdfs:subPropertyOf.
>
Removed the subPropertyOf link (users do not need to declare that
lexinfo:subject rdfs:subPropertyOf synsem:synArg as LexInfo already does
this).

>
> The class synsem:SemanticFrame is declared to be subclass of
> ontolex:LexicalSense; however, in the picture representing the synsem
> module, the arrow representing this axiom is oriented in the opposite
> direction.
>
Fixed

>
> In the paragraph "Semantic Frames", there is a table headed "Type",
> "Predicate", "Example", whose first row contains *City(x)*, ?x rdf:type
> ontology:Person: should it be ?x rdf:type dbpedia-owl:City?
>
Yep, fixed

>
> There is no example (just below the definition of synsem:isA)about the
> representation of unary predicates. Nor is there any example about the
> representation of individuals.
>
Example 8 uses isA... but perhaps we should make this clearer

>
> The definitions of synsem:{subj|obj}OfProp use the following wording:
> "...property represents the semantic argument with represents"
>
> I would avoid a sequence of two "represents". Moreover, I think that
> "with" should be "that".
>
Updated the definitions... it seems they were out-of-sync with the OWL
files.

>
> In Example synsem/example3, there is again owl:subPropertyOf.
>
Removed

>
> Also, In Example synsem/example4, there is again owl:subPropertyOf.
>
Removed

>
> In the section "Complex Senses / Semantic Frames", there is the definition
> of synsem:subframe, while in the figure there is the property
> synsem:subsense.
>
Fixed

>
> Just below Example synsem/example7, there is an example involving the
> property father: the property should point to the child; however, the
> name of the property suggests to me that the object is the father (just in
> the same manner skos:broader points to the broader of a given concept).
>
I agree, fixed

>
> I think that Example synsem/example9  should be explained in more detail.
>
Removed (it does not concern OntoLex)

>
> I didn't find the definition of synsem:propertyDomain and
> synsem:propertyRange; then, I realized that they were moved to the core
> module. The diagram of the core module must be updated to include these
> properties, as well as the diagram of the synsem module to remove them.
>
> I noticed that in the infobox providing the definition of propertyRange
> and propertyDomain, the URI still uses the synsem namespace instead of the
> core ontolex namespace.
>
Yeah thinking about it makes absolutely no sense to have propertyRange and
propertyDomain in the core, for the very simple reason: how can you
restrict the range/domain of arguments when you can't define whether there
are arguments in the first place!?

There is also a technical dependency as the domain of propertyRange and
propertyDomain should be synsem:SemanticFrame.

As such, I have made the unilateral decision to restore condition,
propertyRange and propertyDomain to the synsem module and to introduce them
all as subproperties of ontolex:usage.

>
> Finally, I noticed a typo in the definition of ontolex:LexicalEntry:
> "The class lexical entry represents a unit of analysis of the lexicon that
> consist of a set of forms that are grammatically ... "
>
Fixed

Regards,
John

>
> It should be "that consists" with an append "s".
>
> Best Regards
>
> Manuel Fiorelli
>
>
> 2015-05-13 21:47 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <
> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>  I have been working on finalizing the synsem module, please check:
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification#Syntax_and_Semantics_.28synsem.29
>>
>> The next telco to discuss the synsem module will be on Friday the 22nd of
>> Mai, 16:00 CET.
>>
>> Please send me any issues to discuss or comments on the synsem module by
>> Thurday 21st of Mai at the very latest.
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> AG Semantic Computing
>> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> Universität Bielefeld
>>
>> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Office CITEC-2.307
>> Universitätsstr. 21-25
>> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>> Germany
>>
>>
>>
>