Re: Minutes teleconference last Friday

Re: (10), btw why owl:Thing instead of rdfs:Resource?

> On May 11, 2015, at 9:04:54 AM , Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I summarize the outcomes and decisions made during the telco last Friday:
> 
> 1) Domain of ontolex:language
> 
> We decided to unconstrain the domain of ontolex:language and instead add a = 1 ontolex:language axiom to the ontolex:Lexicon, ontolex:LexicalEntry and lime:LexicalizationSet classes. The doman of ontolex:language would thus be OWL:thing
> 
> 2) Form should have minimum one writtenRep with range rdf:langString
> 
> 3) The range of ontolex:language should be rdfs:Literal
> 
> 4) We should drop the constraint on there being just one written representation per language tag as this is questionable and further it can not be axiomtaized in OWL anyway.
> 
> 5) Example 10 is infelicitous as there should be two lexical entries for "bank" as in the case of geographic vs. financial meaning this is a case of homonymy. So in this case there should be two lexical entries. I will correct the example.
> 
> 6)  Example 9: for the sake of this example I will change the denotation to <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Marriage>
> 
> 7) We decided to keep dct:subject as property to assign a topic to a sense as this is the corresponding property from Dublin Core for this:
> 
> 8) We decided to change the definition of affix to:
> 
> "The class affix represents is a morpheme (suffix, prefix, infix, circumfix, etc.) that is attached to a word stem to form a new word."
> 
> 9) We decided to change the definition of lexical entry to:
> 
> "Lexical Entry is a unit of analysis of lexicon, that consist of a set of forms that are grammatically related and a set of base meanings that are associated with all of these forms. Thus, a lexical entry is a word, multiword expression or affix with a single part-of-speech, morphological pattern, etymology and set of senses."
> 
> 10) We agreed to have domain and ranges for all properties, so I will add also owl:Thing to the range of "reference" for the sake of completeness (we discussed this differently during the telco, but to ensure consistency I propose we indeed explicitly indicate the range here, same for isSenseOf).
> 
> 11) We decided to rename the property "condition" to "usage" and add it to the core module.
> 
> 12) We briefly repeated the rationale for declaring a Lexicon as a dataset.
> 
> TODOs:
> 
> Elena/Lupe: to send me the updated definition of "Lexical Sense"
> John: fix the namespaces
> 
> That's it for now. Thanks to all those who attended the telco.
> 
> I will implement these changes today.
> 
> The next telco will be on the 22nd of Mai, 16:00 CET. We will discuss the synsem module then.
> 
> I will send an email on this soon.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Philipp.
> 
> -- 
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
> 
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> 
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
> 
>

Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 10:19:28 UTC