W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Minutes teleconference last Friday

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:32:09 +0200
Message-ID: <55506909.7020201@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: public-ontolex@w3.org
Dear all,

  ok, I think I have implemented all changes so far.

I am missing:

1) Definition of Lexical Sense (Elena/Lupe)
2) John: can you please regenerate the figures for the examples, 
execution of create_images.sh stops due to missing rdflib on my machine, 
3) Definition of LexicalizationSet, will copy from the lime module

Best regards,


Am 11.05.15 um 09:04 schrieb Philipp Cimiano:
> Dear all,
>  I summarize the outcomes and decisions made during the telco last 
> Friday:
> 1) Domain of ontolex:language
> We decided to unconstrain the domain of ontolex:language and instead 
> add a = 1 ontolex:language axiom to the ontolex:Lexicon, 
> ontolex:LexicalEntry and lime:LexicalizationSet classes. The doman of 
> ontolex:language would thus be OWL:thing
> 2) Form should have minimum one writtenRep with range rdf:langString
> 3) The range of ontolex:language should be rdfs:Literal
> 4) We should drop the constraint on there being just one written 
> representation per language tag as this is questionable and further it 
> can not be axiomtaized in OWL anyway.
> 5) Example 10 is infelicitous as there should be two lexical entries 
> for "bank" as in the case of geographic vs. financial meaning this is 
> a case of homonymy. So in this case there should be two lexical 
> entries. I will correct the example.
> 6)  Example 9: for the sake of this example I will change the 
> denotation to <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Marriage>
> 7) We decided to keep dct:subject as property to assign a topic to a 
> sense as this is the corresponding property from Dublin Core for this:
> 8) We decided to change the definition of affix to:
> "The class affix represents is a morpheme (suffix, prefix, infix, 
> circumfix, etc.) that is attached to a word stem to form a new word."
> 9) We decided to change the definition of lexical entry to:
> "Lexical Entry is a unit of analysis of lexicon, that consist of a set 
> of forms that are grammatically related and a set of base meanings 
> that are associated with all of these forms. Thus, a lexical entry is 
> a word, multiword expression or affix with a single part-of-speech, 
> morphological pattern, etymology and set of senses."
> 10) We agreed to have domain and ranges for all properties, so I will 
> add also owl:Thing to the range of "reference" for the sake of 
> completeness (we discussed this differently during the telco, but to 
> ensure consistency I propose we indeed explicitly indicate the range 
> here, same for isSenseOf).
> 11) We decided to rename the property "condition" to "usage" and add 
> it to the core module.
> 12) We briefly repeated the rationale for declaring a Lexicon as a 
> dataset.
> TODOs:
> Elena/Lupe: to send me the updated definition of "Lexical Sense"
> John: fix the namespaces
> That's it for now. Thanks to all those who attended the telco.
> I will implement these changes today.
> The next telco will be on the 22nd of Mai, 16:00 CET. We will discuss 
> the synsem module then.
> I will send an email on this soon.
> Kind regards,
> Philipp.

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
AG Semantic Computing
Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
Universität Bielefeld

Tel: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 6560
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Office CITEC-2.307
Universitätsstr. 21-25
33615 Bielefeld, NRW
Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 08:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:49 UTC